Crytek CEO: Crysis 2 PC Superior From Every Angle, Max Settings ‘Playable’ With Current Hardware

by Mike Bendel on February 8, 2011 @ 10:56 am


When the original Crysis came out, it was a beast – practically no hardware configuration available at the time could handle it at max settings, unless you opted for a dual video card setup. Expect Crysis 2 to offer a level of detail beyond its console counterparts on PC, however, it won’t completely obliterate the high-end setups of today.

That’s according to Crytek frontman Cevat Yerli. If you have a high-end card from the past year or earlier, rest assured that Crysis 2 will run at max. Additionally, Yerli confirms that those on lesser hardware will be able to crank up the settings higher than on the original Crysis thanks to optimization efforts in CryEngine 3.

“Yeah. Crysis 2 doesn’t suffer from that, in my opinion – it’s superior from every angle,” Yerli told Edge.

“This isn’t necessarily a game you can’t play today, or where you need another two years to max it out. That’s not the approach this time. Now, it’s more like we want to give you the best PC experience with current high-end equipment. So if you bought the last high-end graphics card, you’re going to get a blast out of it. Likewise, the minimum-spec experience will be of a far higher quality than Crysis was.”

Crysis 2 is due out March 22 in the states. A PC multiplayer demo is coming “soon.”

Follow this author on .

Read moreCrytek: Crysis Warhead To Feature Performance EnhancementsCrysis 2 3D Experience Impressed James CameronCapcom Details Modest Street Fighter IV PC RequirementsCrytek: Current Gen To Last Until 2013CryEngine 3 Now Available To Licensees, Streamlines Multiplatform Development

Comments
FrozenIpaq says:

That's reassuring. Although I'm more interested in the recommended specs and want to see how my GTX 275 hold up seeing how it couldn't even play Crysis 1 at max settings smoothly

elite says:

If it's true what Cevat Yerli says, then we don't need another gfx mod to max out settings unlike what happened with the former Crysis.

Zero says:

But there's the other side of the coin, Crysis was demanding as it used the cutting edge in visual technology. Things like object motion blur, screen space ambient occlusion, parralax occlusion mapping, etc.

Is Crytek doing the same for CryEngine 3?

x3sphere says:

Yes, it supports DX11 effects like tessellation and advanced depth of field. The latter was a frame rate killer in Metro 2033, hopefully Crysis 2 has a better implementation.

Bran says:

Is Crysis worth playing? I've never played it. Should I just skip to Warhead?

I know the plot as far as "Koreans... WAIT! Aliens?"

x3sphere says:

Don't skip to Warhead. Both are definitely worth playing, however the original is superior. Nothing special plot-wise, but the gameplay is excellent. Crytek are masters of the FPS genre.

I'm expecting great things from Crysis 2 considering they've had a massive budget to work with this time around.

Zero says:

It's a fantastic single player campaign. The openness is remarkable.

FrozenIpaq says:

Think I might pick up a Gigabyte SOC GTX 560 Ti for Crysis 2 then since my card lacks DX11 support. On a very tight budget and if I do decide to go buy this card then I definitely won't be getting a hotel for PAX :p

Bran says:

I'll try out Crysis then. I'm assuming if I could run Metro 2033 at max settings I can run Crysis, or would I be mistaken?

MenaceInc says:

If not max then very close to it. I can't remember which setting it was exactly but make sure you have shader effects set to very high and shadows to very high.

DEM CREPUSCULAR RAYS

http://i.imgur.com/RgqKZ.jpg

you say:

Login with your username and password below. New User?





Quantcast