Medal of Honor Reboot Fell Short of EA’s ‘Quality Expectations’

by Mike Bendel on November 2, 2010 @ 11:31 am


Last month’s release of the Medal of Honor reboot fell short of internal ‘quality expectations’ within EA, according to the company’s European VP Patrick Soderlund in a frank interview with EG. Mixed reactions aside, EA is hardly deeming it a failed effort. In response to average scores from critics, Soderlund’s believes the Afghanistan-set shooter was given unfair treatment in reviews.

“Medal of Honor is to some extent judged harsher than it should be. The game is better than today’s reviews are indicating.”

Despite its faults, Soderlund feels that the reboot of MoH was a successful one, and it’s serving as a learning experience for EA’s next heavyweight in the shooter space. Soderlund further alluded to the constant comparisons with Activision’s mega-popular Call of Duty franchise.

“I’m not going to say a specific number. I’m proud of what the game is and proud of what the team did. I just think the market is obviously telling us they think the game is X. We need to convince the market we can make something they appreciate more, particularly to be able to compete.”

Follow this author on .

Read moreEA Stock Takes a Plunge After MoH ReviewsMedal of Honor Reboot DatedMedal of Honor Limited Edition Available For Pre-OrderMedal of Honor Reboot Set for Fall 2010Get a Glimpse of Medal of Honor Single-player

Comments
slicer4ever says:

In the end it's not what they want, it's what the consumer wants, and if the consumer says it sucks, then it sucks

Robby says:

I did appreciate the improvement from the beta to the retail version, but it just wasn't meeting expectations. Timing was off too I think, too close to Black Ops.

you say:

Login with your username and password below. New User?





Quantcast